Social networks suck. I’m tempted to stop right here, but I realize that’s just a side effect of my Twittering. Since we have more than 140 characters to discuss, I’ll keep it going and try to explain what gets me down.
It isn’t the friending issue. As much as I hate re-upping each friend / colleague I have inside each new network, support groups are already being formed by geeks with more friends than me, and solutions will find the market (real people) before the market finds the issue (social network fatigue).
It’s not even redundant profiles. The idea of creating / gardening more than one is also lame, but there’s a lot going on with decentralized presence. Services like OpenID and OAuth are already batting at the cause, and it’s only a matter of time before the browsers jump in as well. (I’m downloading Flock 1.0 right now.)
Then there’s your caged activity profile (i.e., who, when, what you interact with). This also sucks, but I can live with the idea that, beyond my friend lists or profiles, most of my data activity is meaningless outside of the context in which it’s caged. Did I get bit by a zombie or a werewolf? Maybe it was a chump. Whatever. I’m only interested in keeping the connection, Facebook can have the manner.
So what else is locked down? Publishing streams, right? I can get past that too. I don’t originate anything inside a closed network that doesn’t need that context to make sense. The crap I post in MySpace should stay there. I don’t want it on my blog. The streams I deem ready for public consumption are available for re-syndication via RSS, etc. My answer to not being able to export my Facebook statuses, for instance, is to not post them there to begin with. I republish my public Twitter timeline instead.
I’m pretty much over all of that (which is to say, I can point to and even implement emerging solutions for most of these issues).
What I can’t get past is the idea that these damn things (social networks) put a log in wall between communication channels. So any point of contact I want to make (whether message, friend request or zombie bite) means the network I’m currently logged into is just going to bleep/blorp an email to my counterpart instructing them to log in if they’d like to see what just happened.
WTF is that? It’s certainly not interaction. At least not in the sense of anything that’s come since email chess, circa 1993.
*sigh*
We bang up against requests to build social networks every day at ep. Most of the projects we’re engaged in, though, are either niche enough to keep my data caging complaints at bay, or they aren’t actually social networks at all (they’re collaboration apps). But we still battle the idea of the log in wall.
Too many people think you measure community in terms of sign-ons. And the way to build sign-ons is to blorp a bunch of teasers to their users.
But what if there was a service like OpenID that actually did act as a single sign-on model? What if people were perpetually signed in to their networks? And, what if messages and alerts and notifications across all networks were delivered in decentralized form, like that of an IM window?
Crazy right? It shouldn’t be.
Right on. I totally agree with this. It’s something I’ve been working on, using Jabber as the backend protocol to unify the messaging services from and between each network.
It does require a kind of smart inbox, but I think that’s coming too.
Anyway, you captured the situation brilliantly.
Hey Chris, thanks for stopping in. I’ve seen some of your posts on the topic - glad you’re chasing. I have to think there’s a startup hermit or two working on this as well - seems so fundamentally screwed up, and maybe even easy to correct.
I was talking to a friend who was working at a company that is building social networking sites for use inside corporations.
I made the point that this is actually pretty exciting, because a corporate-funded internal network would be focused around *communication* instead of page views for ad sales. So when someone contacts you through the site, it would just send you an email! The message would be stored at the site, too, making it searchable. But the immediate use would be direct to you, without the annoying intermediary.
Yeah, ignoring valuations and ad sales makes thinking clearly an easier thing. I’m sure it’ll be interesting stuff - sounds crazy, though. Does it have a built-in org chart?